View Post

Explaining the Twelfth Amendment for Those in the Media Who Seem to Be Reading Impaired

In Standard by Red StateLeave a Comment

This post was originally published on this site

I have already largely completed an article addressing the question of what Vice President Mike Pence might do in an alternative universe under a certain set of hypothetical circumstances on January 6.

But I’ve grown weary from reading articles from online pundits that purport to tell everyone what the Congress is going to do, can do, won’t do, can’t do on Wednesday when it meets in Joint Session.

So, before my other article hits the presses, I’m taking a step back and going through — you know — what is actually WRITTEN in the Twelfth Amendment about counting electoral votes.

The Twelfth Amendment was adopted in June 1804 — ahead of the Presidential election of 1804 — and replaced the provision regarding the function of the Electoral College that was set forth in Art. II, Sec. 1, Clause 3 of the Constitution as originally drafted.

The purpose of the Amendment was to address the extraordinarily close outcomes of the Presidential election in 1796 and 1800.  The process set forth in the Constitution had resulted in the election of a President and Vice President from different political parties in 1796 — which turned out to be problematic since the one-party was pro-British and the other was pro-French in the armed hostilities between the two countries at the time.

In 1800, a tie in the Electoral College vote led to 36 ballots in the House of Representatives before it finally elected Thomas Jefferson over Aaron Burr — both from the Democrat-Republican Party. Both had received the same number of Electoral Votes since under the original system each elector cast 2 votes without distinguishing between a vote for President and a vote for Vice President.

The Twelfth Amendment was passed to remedy the deficiencies of the original Electoral College as they had been revealed in the first two times it was used to determine a contested election — George Washington having been elected twice without opposition.

Now that we know “why” we have a Twelfth Amendment, let’s set aside the various idiot punditocracy pronouncements about what happens by ….. let’s say ….. READING THE TEXT!!

I’m going to break it down here in the individual component parts revealed by the text (I’ve redacted some of the language not necessary to understand the process):

The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President,

The Electors shall meet in their states and vote.  That has already taken place as the date for the meeting of the Electoral College is set by statute. This year it was December 14, 2020.

they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President,

Each elector casts two ballots, one each for President and Vice-President. They have already done that.

and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;

See note above.

The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;

The President of the Senate is the Vice President of the United States. Mike Pence:  “Hey Nancy, if you are done stabbing AOC in the back, can you pass me the letter opener?”

“And the votes shall be counted” — The VP’s eyes dart around the Chamber as he wonders “Who is “The Counter“.

The person having the greatest Number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed;

Wait — what about the Congressional “certification” and blessing with Holy Water by Barack Obama while held in the arms of the Ladies of “The View?”  Doesn’t all that have to happen before Joe Biden is crowned?

Exactly.

and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President.

So, here is the real constitutional “rub” from the language.  What exactly is meant by the phrase “a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed”?

Does that mean that because every state has transmitted a list of votes by electors that all 538 electors have been “appointed”?  Or is there any basis by which anyone can determine that some states’ electors were not “appointed”?   Who decides?

But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice.

In this circumstance, there would be 50 votes cast — one by each state — and it takes 26 votes to win.  A quorum necessary to conduct the vote shall be constituted by the presence of a member from two-thirds of the states — or 34.

All the stuff you are reading about “objections,” and debates on objections and votes on objections — which I’ll cover more in my next article — derives from a statute passed by Congress in 1887, the “Electoral Vote Act.”

There is a strong argument that the EVA is actually unconstitutional as it adds details and procedures to the process set forth in the Twelfth Amendment — which is part of the Constitution. You can’t amend the Constitution through legislation as that deprives the State Legislatures of their role in participating in the Amendment process. Before an Amendment can be adopted, three-fourths of all State Legislatures must approve.

Congress critters are going to do what they are going to do come Wednesday.  But describing what they do as a constitutional duty, or a certification, or a validation, or an endorsement of what took place in the individual states on November 3 and thereafter is all nonsense and bloviating by folks who do not understand the plain and simple language of the Constitution.

The lists of votes were sealed and transmitted from the States to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the attention of the President of the Senate.

The Amendment directs that he open them and they be counted.

Beyond that …..

Stay tuned.

View Post

Porn star Aria Lee serving as own lawyer in $10M lawsuit

In Standard by NY PostLeave a Comment

This post was originally published on this site

Porn star Aria Lee is representing herself in court against a $10 million defamation suit filed by adult film director Craven Moorehead, Page Six has learned.

Lee is serving as her own attorney in the case, and has filed court documents in LA Superior Court denying the claims in Moorehead’s suit against her.

Not only that, she’s going up against a powerhouse lawyer.

Page Six previously reported that Moorehead filed the eight-figure suit against Lee in September, after she alleged on social media, and in an interview with Adult Video News, that he sexually assaulted her twice last year. She claimed the assaults took place behind-the-scenes on an X-rated film set, and in Moorehead’s car months later.

Moorehead then vehemently denied the allegations in court documents, and blasted Lee’s claims as “false, malicious, defamatory and hurtful.” He called her version of the events, “outlandish, outright fabrications.”

Lee has now denied Moorehead’s allegations in her own court filing this month, obtained by Page Six. The documents — which state Lee’s defense is “in pro per” (legalese for representing herself) — allege that Moorehead’s complaint “fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action” against her, and also alleges that her “purported statements were true and thus a defense” to his legal action.

The papers also allege that Moorehead’s side has “waived any claim they have,” without going into further detail, and that Moorehead’s suit failed to name the plaintiff or defendant by their real name.

An initial hearing in the case is scheduled for Feb. 21, court records show.

According to a Twitter bio, Lee was an AVN Best New Starlet and Best Ass nominee in 2020. Moorehead was inducted into the AVN Hall of Fame in 2015, and has 377 X-rated films under his belt as director, according to IMDB.

He’s being repped in the case by Sergio Castaneda in LA, and NYC power lawyer Robert Hantman — who told us when we reached out for comment, “If a porn star can be a lawyer why not a lawyer being a porn star!” (He added he’s not considering a change of profession.)

Lee did not return an email seeking comment.

View Post

A 108ft long concrete vagina sculpture sparks fury in Brazil  

In Standard by UK Daily MailLeave a Comment

This post was originally published on this site

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/01/04/14/37580562-0-image-a-23_1609769203800.jpg

A 108ft long concrete vagina sculpture embedded on a hillside sparks fury in Brazil

  • ‘Diva’, a scarlet sculpture of a vagina on a hillside in Brazil, has polarised opinions
  • ‘One of the stupidest things I’ve ever seen!’ one critic of the artwork said  
  • Others praised the sculpture for its ‘beauty’ and ‘elevation of feminism’ 

A 108ft long concrete vagina sculture embedded on a hillside has sparked fury in Brazil.

The sculpture was built on the grounds of a former sugar mill in the Brazilian state of  Pernambuco and unveiled on Saturday.

The scarlet sculpture, titled ‘Diva’, stretches for 33 metres and was built into the hillside with the help of diggers. Visual artist Juliana Notari was behind its creation.

The scarlet sculpture, titled ‘Diva’, stretches for 33 metres and was built into the hillside with the help of diggers. Visual artist Juliana Notari is pictured above

The sculpture was built on the grounds of a former sugar mill in the Brazilian state of Pernambuco and unveiled on Saturday

The sculpture was built on the grounds of a former sugar mill in the Brazilian state of Pernambuco and unveiled on Saturday

The sculpture attracted backlash from critics of the artwork, with one person writing on Facebook: 'One of the stupidest things I've ever seen!'

The sculpture attracted backlash from critics of the artwork, with one person writing on Facebook: ‘One of the stupidest things I’ve ever seen!’

The sculpture attracted backlash from critics of the artwork, with one person writing on Facebook: ‘One of the stupidest things I’ve ever seen!’

‘Who do you lefties think you’re fooling? Apart from useful idiots on the left, of course,’ another person said.

One Facebook user questioned how appropriate the artwork was for children. ‘With all due respect I didn’t like it Imagine me hanging out with my little daughters in this park and they ask… daddy what is that? What will I answer?

‘Didn’t think it was cool. It’s worse the government allowed this to be done in a public park.’

The controversial sculpture is pictured in the process of being built into the hillside, above and below

The controversial sculpture is pictured in the process of being built into the hillside, above and below

According to artist Juliana Notari, 'Diva' was intended to 'question the relationship between nature and culture in our phallocentric and anthropocentric western society'

According to artist Juliana Notari, ‘Diva’ was intended to ‘question the relationship between nature and culture in our phallocentric and anthropocentric western society’

One person referred to it as 'amazing and beautiful' while another wrote 'I loved it! An intimate part of us exposed with such beauty. We need more such works that elevate feminism and its nuances'

One person referred to it as ‘amazing and beautiful’ while another wrote ‘I loved it! An intimate part of us exposed with such beauty. We need more such works that elevate feminism and its nuances’

Others celebrated the unique artwork, with trans cartoonist Laerte Coutinho writing on Twitter that there was ‘a lot to think about’ with the sculpture.

One person referred to it as ‘amazing and beautiful’ while another wrote ‘I loved it! An intimate part of us exposed with such beauty. We need more such works that elevate feminism and its nuances.’

According to artist Juliana Notari, ‘Diva’ was intended to ‘question the relationship between nature and culture in our phallocentric and anthropocentric western society’ as well as provoke debate over the ‘problematisation of gender’.

Apparently referencing Jair Bolsonaro’s presidency, Notari wrote in the Facebook post: ‘Nowadays these issues have become increasingly urgent.’

The Facebook post amassed more than 12,000 shares and 28,000 likes.

Apparently referencing Jair Bolsonaro's presidency, Notari wrote in the Facebook post: 'Nowadays these issues have become increasingly urgent'

Apparently referencing Jair Bolsonaro’s presidency, Notari wrote in the Facebook post: ‘Nowadays these issues have become increasingly urgent’

View Post

First migrants cross The Channel since Brexit as dinghy carrying 10 people intercepted

In Standard by UK Daily MailLeave a Comment

This post was originally published on this site

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/01/04/12/37578400-0-image-m-47_1609765048775.jpg

First migrants cross The Channel since Brexit as dinghy carrying 10 people is intercepted by Border Force patrol in -1C freeze after record 8,410 made treacherous journey in 2020

  • Group of 10 migrants intercepted in Channel and brought to Dover on Saturday
  • The group after the first to make it across the Channel since Brexit deal came in
  • Changes mean UK no longer accepts asylum at sea, but little practical impact
  • Law change paves way to send groups back to France, but a deal is first needed
  • In total, 8,410 migrants made perilous crossing from France to the UK last year 

The first migrants to cross The Channel since the UK’s new Brexit deal came into force have been brought into Dover – after more than 8,400 made the dangerous crossing last year.

One boat carrying around 10 people was intercepted and brought into Dover Marina, Kent shortly before 5am on Saturday.

Border Force towed the blue and white rigid hulled inflatable boat into the harbour before escorting the migrants up the gangway to be processed.

The men, wearing face masks, red lifejackets and wrapped in white blankets for warmth, appeared to be shivering from the bitter -1C temperature.

Former MEP and Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage posted about the incident on Twitter, saying: ‘The first migrant boat of 2021. Brexit Britain needs to stop this.’

He included a video of the migrants being brought ashore in Dover on Saturday.

It comes after groups of migrants attempted the perilous crossing either side of the end of the Brexit transition deal – with one group being rescued and brought to Dover on New Year’s Eve and another being rescued by French officials on New Year’s Day.

The latest incident comes after groups of migrants attempted the perilous crossing either side of the end of the Brexit transition deal. Pictured: Migrants are brought ashore in Dover on December 31

One group were rescued and brought to Dover on New Year's Eve and another being rescued by French officials on New Year's Day (pictured: Migrants are rescued and brought back to France on New Year's Day)

One group were rescued and brought to Dover on New Year’s Eve and another being rescued by French officials on New Year’s Day (pictured: Migrants are rescued and brought back to France on New Year’s Day)

Though Britain’s new trade deal came into force on January 1, and new laws on asylum seekers along with it, the rules remain largely the same for those attempting the crossing.

Britain has said it will no longer accept asylum claims at sea, paving a way for those crossing The Channel to be returned to France.

But the UK will not be permitted to do that until an agreement with France is reached.

Home Secretary Priti Patel signed a new deal with France at the end of November, after 757 people crossed, in an attempt to prevent crossings from disembarking from their shores.

She pledged up to £28milllion to double patrols along a 90-mile stretch of French coastline to scupper people smuggling gangs – seen as one of the root causes of the issue.

The latest migrant crossing comes after three people attempted to make the perilous 21-mile journey by small boat on New Year’s Day just hours after the end of the Brexit transition period.

They had called French emergency services after getting into difficulty off Equihen-Plage.

The French Navy warship Rhône and coastguard patrol vessel Jacques Oudart Fourmentin and coastal maritime surveillance boat Scarp were all scrambled to their dramatic rescue.

The coastguard vessel took the three migrants, one suffering from hypothermia, and their boat back to border police at Boulogne-sur-Mer shortly before 1pm.

Figures show a record 8,410 migrants made the treacherous Channel crossing by small boat last year – four times more than the 1,850 who made the journey in the whole of 2019.

A total of 211 people made it to UK shores in December following 33 arriving on New Year’s Eve.

The busiest month of the year was September when 1,954 migrants arrived – more than the entirety of last year.

September 2 saw the most migrants arrive in a single day ever as a record 416 made the dangerous journey on 28 boats.

Migrants rescued from the Channel disembark from a customs ship and are cared for by the medical staff on the dock of port on New Year's Day in Boulogne-sur-Mer, France

Migrants rescued from the Channel disembark from a customs ship and are cared for by the medical staff on the dock of port on New Year’s Day in Boulogne-sur-Mer, France

The month capped off an unprecedentedly busy Summer for Border Force and lifeboat crews as 1,468 migrants made the journey in August and 1,118 arrived in July.

Nine people are known to have died in the attempt this year including a family of five and two other men who drowned in October in one incident when their boat capsized off Dunkirk.

The bodies of Kurdish-Iranian Rasoul Iran-Nejad, 35, Shiva Mohammad Panahi, 35, Anita, nine, and Armin, six, were recovered.

But 15 month old Artin’s body has still not been found, along with two other men who also perished in the tragedy.

Two other men who were on board the boat when it capsized off Loon-Plage near Dunkirk at around 9.30am are also believed to have died from the same boat.

Also in October an Iranian man in his 20s drowned and was found washed up on a beach. He was only identified as BB.

In August Sudanese man Abdulfatah Hamdallah, aged 28, drowned trying to make the crossing with a friend.

A total of 463 reached the UK that month.

Advertisement
View Post

Google Workers Unionize Claiming Firm Silences Anti-Trust, Monopoly Concerns

In Standard by National PulseLeave a Comment

This post was originally published on this site

Following the creation of an Alphabet Workers Union led by employees at Google, a New York Times op-ed by the union’s leaders reveals Google silences employees who speak out on issues including “antitrust and monopoly power.”

The revelation follows the Department of Justice (DOJ) suing Google for violating antitrust laws.

Included in the op-ed entitled “We Built Google. This Is Not the Company We Want to Work For,” the Executive Chair and Vice-Chair of the newly-formed Alphabet Workers Union reveal how the tech giant “cracks down” on employees who address topics including antitrust and monopoly power:

“Alphabet continues to crack down on those who dare to speak out, and keep workers from speaking on sensitive and publicly important topics, like antitrust and monopoly power.”

The news comes while the op-ed authors attempt to justify the creation of the new union at Alphabet, Google’s parent company, noting “to those who are skeptical of unions or believe that tech companies are more innovative without unions, we want to point out that these and other larger problems persist.

Among the other problems identified at the company are “discrimination and harassment.”

“For a handful of wealthy executives, this discrimination and unethical working environment are working as intended,” the piece adds.

‘Growing Body of Evidence’ COVID Leaked From CCP Lab

In Standard by National PulseLeave a Comment

This post was originally published on this site

U.S. National Security Adviser Matthew Pottinger reportedly claimed “there is a growing body of evidence” that COVID-19 was manufactured in a Chinese lab.

The remarks are said to have occurred on the Trump appointee’s recent Zoom call with British officials.

“There is a growing body of evidence that the lab is likely the most credible source of the virus,” Pottinger noted. according to the Daily Mail.

Pottinger continued, noting the World Health Organization’s (WHO) probe to discern the origins of COVID-19 is a ruse and that the pathogen likely escaped through “‘leak or an accident.”

He encouraged British Members of Parliament (MP) to help expose the Chinese Communist Party’s role in manufacturing the virus, downplaying the wet market theory as being “openly dismissed” by “establishment figures in Beijing:

“MPs around the world have a moral role to play in exposing the WHO investigation as a Potemkin exercise. Even establishment figures in Beijing have openly dismissed the wet market story.”

View Post

Rules For Us and Rules For Them

In Standard by American SpectatorLeave a Comment

This post was originally published on this site

Of all the quotable lines in George Orwell’s Animal Farm, few resonate as much as this one: “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.” That was, of course, the proclamation of the pigs who controlled the government, lest any of the lesser species harbor grandiose notions about their place in the barnyard’s pecking order.

That quotation has been referred to often in recent days after Gov. Gavin Newsom — fresh off of issuing a new set of edicts admonishing Californians to dine alone at home and curtail their Thanksgiving celebrations — was caught dining with his wife and 10 other friends at a birthday party for a prominent lobbyist at the French Laundry in Yountville.

No one is surprised that governors live comfortable lives, but it’s a bit rich when they are immune from the rules that they wantonly impose on the rest of us.

It’s bad enough for the governor to seemingly violate his own edicts, but to do so in Napa Valley, at one of the nation’s toniest restaurants, certainly gave off the wrong vibe. The governor claims that his attendance at the event wasn’t actually a violation of state coronavirus restrictions because they dined outdoors, but he did eventually issue an apology.

“I made a bad mistake. Instead of sitting down, I should have stood up and walked back, got in my car and drove back to my house,” Newsom said in a video statement. “The spirit of what I’m preaching all the time was contradicted, and I got to own that. And so I want to apologize to you…. We’re all human, we all fall short sometimes.” ‘

That’s fair enough, but this wasn’t the only example of a governor who lives by a different set of rules. Sacramento’s public schools have yet to reopen as they await the final phase-in rules, but Newsom’s four children are back in classrooms at the high-end private school where he sends them. No one is surprised that governors live comfortable lives, but it’s a bit rich when they are immune from the rules that they wantonly impose on the rest of us.

It’s not just the governor, either. “Legislators from California and other states are gathering for an annual conference in Maui this week despite a spike in COVID-19 cases in the Golden State that resulted in travel warnings by health officials,” the Los Angeles Times reported. They are attending an annual conference sponsored by a nonprofit group that often pays legislators’ expenses.

Only one lawmaker has thus far admitted attending the conference this year. But as Politico reporter Jeremy White noted on Twitter: “[W]hy not just admit if you’re in Hawaii? We will find out sooner or later. If you want to keep it secret, don’t go!” Exactly. There’s nothing wrong with attending — but the timing is bad, and why not just admit it?

I find it odd that the legislators and Newsom are so tone-deaf that they couldn’t see the criticism coming, or understand why average Californians would be upset at the fracas — especially as officials call for tougher enforcement of the state’s travel and social-distancing rules. Even California’s mostly liberal commentators have been aghast.

“We certainly hope Gov. Gavin Newsom and his wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, enjoyed their dinner at the Michelin-starred restaurant on Nov. 6,” the Sacramento Bee Editorial Board recently opined. “Nothing will launder the stain of stupidity from his reputation after this ill-conceived outing.”

Fortunately, a Sutter County court, ruling in a case brought by Republican Assembly members James Gallagher and Kevin Kiley, has reined in some of the governor’s edict-issuing powers. The specific issue involved Newsom’s March 4 executive order mandating that the state send all registered voters a mail-in ballot. Gallagher and Kiley had no problem with expanded absentee balloting — but argued correctly that only the Legislature has that power.

The Legislature did follow up with a law that did as much, which only reinforces how unnecessary it was for the governor to impose this reform by edict. Newsom’s legal team argued that the Legislature’s action made the case moot, but Judge Sarah Heckman ruled that the matter had great relevance given the far-reaching executive orders the governor had been signing. In other words, the case was about unchecked executive action, not one order per se.

The judge found that the California Emergency Services Act (CESA) gives governors expanded powers — but they are not limitless. Any governor can make and amend regulations during an emergency, but cannot create new laws or unilaterally rewrite existing ones. The judge had issued a preliminary decision but followed up with a final nine-page ruling.

“Not only is this an active and ongoing controversy between the parties, but it is a critically important one for the Judicial Branch to resolve,” the judge ruled. “The state of emergency brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic … continues in effect, indefinitely, and the governor continues to have authority to act under the CESA.” The governor “has issued more than 50 different executive orders changing numerous California statutes since the state of emergency was declared.”

In fact, Assembly member Kiley has published a 123-page list of the governor’s far-reaching executive actions since that March 4 executive order — thus highlighting the degree to which the state has moved from the rule of law to rule by one man. Higher courts will no doubt address the matter, but at least for now our wannabe king has had some of his powers reined in.

Only the courts can restore some balance. But who knows what it will take to remind the governor and the state’s lawmakers that, perhaps, they ought not attend fancy dinners and Hawaiian junkets at the same time that they are hectoring us to shelter in place?

Steven Greenhut is Western region director for the R Street Institute. Write to him at sgreenhut@rstreet.org.

The post Rules For Us and Rules For Them appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

View Post

REPORT: John Durham Dropping His Investigations into Spygate, “Worried About Blowback From Joe Biden”

In Standard by Gateway PunditLeave a Comment

This post was originally published on this site

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/IMG_4976.jpg

John Durham

It appears the appointment of John Durham was another head fake.

US Attorney General Bill Barr appointed US Attorney from Connecticut John Durham to investigate the origins of Spygate in May of 2019.

So far only one FBI lawyer has been charged with making a false statement in Durham’s investigation.

Former FBI Attorney Kevin Clinesmith plead guilty in August to one charge of making false statements 18 USC 1001 a(3) “makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry.”

TRENDING: WE CAUGHT THEM! Part 3: SAME IMPOSSIBLE BALLOT RATIO Found in Milwaukee – Results Change Wisconsin Election – 30,000 Votes Switched from President Trump to Biden

38-year-old Clinemsith altered an email from CIA investigators used to request a FISA warrant and renewals on Trump campaign advisor Carter Page.

Sunday Morning Futures host Maria Bartiromo reported in September that Durham would NOT release his Spygate report before the 2020 election.

According to Bartiromo, a debate has begun within the Department of Justice as the timing of John Durham’s criminal investigation conclusion. Sources said it is now too close to the election and could be viewed as politically motivated.

Now this…

According to The Federalist, “John Durham isn’t doing anything” and he is “dropping his investigations.”

“He’s worried about blowback from Biden.”

WE CAUGHT THEM! Part 3: SAME IMPOSSIBLE BALLOT RATIO Found in Milwaukee – Results Change Wisconsin Election – 30,000 Votes Switched from President Trump to Biden

In Standard by Gateway PunditLeave a Comment

This post was originally published on this site

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/fraud-vote.jpg

A deep dive into the results in Milwaukee shows a similar pattern The Gateway Pundit found in Pennsylvania and  Dr. Shiva found in Michigan.  The more Republican the precinct the higher percentage of votes shifted from President Trump to Joe Biden.

We’ve also previously reported on the results from Milwaukee where the number of votes that went for Joe Biden made no sense using the statistical technique known as ‘Benford Analysis’:

Audit Statistical Technique Known as ‘Benford Analysis’ Points to Milwaukee Precincts as Central Point to Uncover Fraud

Next we reported on a pattern identified in Michigan’s results by Dr. Shiva from Massachusetts, where Trump votes were systematically switched from President Trump to Joe Biden in consistent manner.  This pattern is too consistent to be found in a natural set of numbers and therefore indicates ‘monkey business’ or fraud.

TRENDING: WE CAUGHT THEM! Part 3: SAME IMPOSSIBLE BALLOT RATIO Found in Milwaukee – Results Change Wisconsin Election – 30,000 Votes Switched from President Trump to Biden

Today we report the results of a similar analysis of the results in Milwaukee based on Dr. Shiva’s analysis.  We analyzed precincts in Milwaukee and found again that votes were transferred from President Trump to Joe Biden in an unnatural pattern indicating fraud.

According to Dr. Shiva and others, the voting machines used in the US in the current election and in prior elections have the ability to store votes not as binomial characters but as fractions.  This allows these machines to weigh votes for candidates and change elections based on this weighting.

There is NO REASON why this feature should be included on a voting machine.

There is only ONE REASON to include this feature on voting machines — to STEAL elections.

For example, if you like a candidate you count two votes for every vote he or she receives.  If you don’t like a candidate you give that candidate one-half a vote for every vote that person receives.  You then set up a voting machine’s weighting such that all votes are allocated based on you weighting.  At the end of the day you count ballots and all are counted but the number of votes for the first candidate is nearly twice as much as the number of votes that candidate received and half as much of the number of votes for the second candidate.  This can be done because we’ve found that votes are stored as decimals in US voting machines providing for manipulation and voter fraud.

Dr. Shiva was on with conservative talk show host Larry Elder and he explained this process in a short interview held during the past week:

The longer version of Dr. Shiva’s talk regarding the 2020 steal  is provided below.  In this video Dr. Shiva and two colleagues discuss the election in Michigan and how in three counties a minimum of 138,000 votes were transferred from President Trump to Joe Biden.  This is because the voting machines used in these counties are able to allocate votes.

This leads us to today. 

A data scientist who remains anonymous performed a review of the data in precincts in Milwaukee.  His conclusion is very similar to Dr. Shiva’s in Michigan in three counties.  The more Republican the makeup of a precinct, the more votes that were taken away from President Trump and ‘switched’ to Joe Biden.  Also, ironically these votes move in a linear fashion which is very disturbing and highly, highly unlikely.  The pattern indicates that these precincts were manipulated and votes were removed from President Trump and allocated to Joe Biden.

As Dr. Shiva would say, ‘this is too perfect’.  Our analysis of precincts in Milwaukee shows the same hockey stick pattern, which is highly, highly unlikely, and similar to what Dr. Shiva observed in Michigan:

Based on the above analysis for Milwaukee, the higher a precincts percent of Republican votes for Congress, the lower the percent of Trump votes for President.  This doesn’t make sense and is highly, highly unlikely.  The reasonable expectation is the more the Republican votes for Congress, the more the number of Trump votes as well.

The fact that this pattern occurred in swing state Wisconsin in the exact same pattern as was identified in swing state Michigan, provides additional information on a systemic fraud across the country in our 2020 Presidential election.

We compared the Milwaukee results to Dane County Wisconsin results and they are very different.  In Dane county the percent of Trump votes in the county is very similar to the percent of Republican votes.  This is expected.

In Milwaukee, when statistically eliminating the current highly unlikely and impossible results (i.e. fraud), the more likely result is 30,700 more votes for President Trump and a corresponding 30,700 votes less in Joe Biden’s column.  The total being a 61,400 vote swap.

With Biden currently leading President Trump by only 21,000 votes, this analysis at a precinct level when corrected would move President Trump to the win column in Wisconsin.

The more we dig into the data, the more we identify patterns that don’t make any sense at all.  The reason the numbers don’t make statistical sense is because there is something going on, and it’s more than likely fraud.

Biden campaign says Burisma meeting not on ‘official schedule’

In Standard by NY PostLeave a Comment

This post was originally published on this site

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden’s campaign said Wednesday in a carefully worded statement there were no meetings on his “official schedules” in 2015 with Burisma board adviser Vadym Pozharskyi.

The response to The Post’s expose Wednesday about how emails about the meeting were found on his son Hunter Biden’s laptop does not mention any personal calendars or dispute that the get-together actually happened.

Biden has not directly responded to the reporting, which appears to debunk his prior claim he had “never spoken” with his son about his “overseas business dealing.”

Biden led the Obama administration’s Ukraine policy while Hunter Biden earned a reported $83,000 per month on Burisma’s board, despite no prior industry experience.

Pozharskyi, an adviser to the board of Burisma, allegedly emailed Hunter Biden on April 17, 2015, about a year after Hunter joined the Burisma board, to thank him for facilitating a meeting.

“Dear Hunter, thank you for inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spent [sic] some time together. It’s realty [sic] an honor and pleasure,” the alleged email reads.

Biden campaign spokesman Andrew Bates said in a statement to Politico that the meeting was not on Biden’s “official schedules” and did not take place “as alleged.” The statement does not foreclose a meeting taking place in an unofficial manner.

“[W]e have reviewed Joe Biden’s official schedules from the time and no meeting, as alleged by the New York Post, ever took place,” Bates said.

The Biden campaign did not respond to five requests for comment from The Post before publication of the initial account. The candidate himself declared an early-morning lid Wednesday, meaning he will have no public events.

“Investigations by the press, during impeachment, and even by two Republican-led Senate committees whose work was decried as ‘not legitimate’ and political by a GOP colleague have all reached the same conclusion: that Joe Biden carried out official U.S. policy toward Ukraine and engaged in no wrongdoing. Trump Administration officials have attested to these facts under oath,” Bates said to Politico.

“The New York Post never asked the Biden campaign about the critical elements of this story. They certainly never raised that Rudy Giuliani — whose discredited conspiracy theories and alliance with figures connected to Russian intelligence have been widely reported — claimed to have such materials.”

However, in addition to repeated requests for comment sent to the Biden campaign, including to Bates himself, before publication, The Post informed a lawyer for Hunter Biden, George R. Mesires, of Giuliani’s role in passing the hard drive’s contents to The Post.

Hunter BidenHunter BidenAstrid Stawiarz/Getty Images for Town & Country

The Post specified in the email that “Rudy Giuliani gave The Post an external hard drive that the owner of a computer-repair shop in Delaware told The Post was copied from a laptop that Hunter Biden brought in for repair but never picked up.”

House Democrats impeached President Trump in December for asking Ukraine to investigate Hunter Biden’s employment. Senate Republicans acquitted Trump in February of charges he abused his power and obstructed a congressional investigation.

The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee is working with the Delaware computer repairman, whose identity was confirmed by The Post, to verify the documents on the hard drive.