View Post

LEAKED Inside Documents show BLUE PRINT of Radical Left’s Rapid Response Plan to Disrupt SCOTUS Nomination and Vote

In Standard by Gateway PunditLeave a Comment

This post was originally published on this site

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/scotus-action-plan.jpg

Investigative journalist Millie Weaver released the far left blue prints for the far left’s plans for protesting President Trump’s Supreme Court pick.

President Trump is expected to announce his pick on Saturday at 5:00 PM Eastern.

The left has already released its blue print to disrupt and shut down the Senate during the confirmation hearings and vote to confirm.

The Blue Print includes tips on messaging, coordinated social media posts and slogans.

TRENDING: BREAKING REPORT: President Trump to Nominate Amy Coney Barrett to Replace Ginsburg on the Supreme Court

The blue prints even instruct the mob on staging tactics during the demonstrations.

EXCLUSIVE – LEAKED Inside docs show BLUE PRINTS for the radical left’s entire plans for protesting Trump’s SCOTUS nomination 👇

Video Gold: CNN Host Alisyn Camerota's Face as Voters Explain Why They’re Voting for Trump

In Standard by Red StateLeave a Comment

This post was originally published on this site

AP featured imagePeople walk outside CNN Center, Wednesday, Oct. 24, 2018, in Atlanta. CNN is now screening all people who enter after a suspicious package was delivered to CNN in New York. NYPD’s chief of counterterrorism says the explosive device sent to CNN’s headquarters in New York appeared to be sent by the same person who mailed pipe bombs to George Soros, Hillary Clinton and former President Barack Obama. (AP Photo/Ron Harris)

I must admit, it’s a lot of fun when CNN gets taken by surprise and they end up having to report real news rather than just their regular 24/7 anti-Trump narrative.

Sometimes a little truth does accidentally slip through on their network, though, as it did today during one of their segments on the election.

CNN’s Alysin Camerota was talking with voters who were talking about the key issues that were driving them to vote.

But as they began to explain why they were voting for Trump, you can look at her face and she appears to be trying to hold it all together and not lose it. I’ve never seen someone blink so many times in such a short period. She looks almost like she’s about to hurl and you can tell she’s thinking something like, ‘Damn, he might actually win. Again!’

Sean Roberts, a Florida voter said, “The president is making every effort to do his best for people of color…the president is bringing us together.”

“He’s doing a phenomenal job and he has my vote. Absolutely,” declared Alexis Frost Cazimero, a California voter.

It’s almost as if they haven’t been listening to the CNN propaganda about Trump but have actually made their own judgments based upon everything he has done.

What segment producer let that go by and will he have a job for doing so? It’s surprising it made it to air.

Better prepare for Election Night, CNN is going to be a basket case when he wins. I can hear them now trying to say, “We have to wait to declare the winner until all the votes are counted (wherever we can find them).”

HT: Twitchy

View Post

Over 1,000 Shot in NYC Since June, Getting Worse by the Month

In Standard by Epoch TimesLeave a Comment

This post was originally published on this site

Violence in New York City is getting worse as NYPD data shows 1,017 people got shot, fatally and otherwise, between June 1 and Sept. 20.

The violence has escalated since late May, coinciding with the riots in response to the death of George Floyd during an arrest in Minneapolis. The data indicates the shooting trend is still accelerating compared to the year before.

  • In April, 64 were shot in the city, down from 67 in April the year prior.
  • In May, 113 were shot, up nearly 55 percent from the same month in 2019.
  • In June, 270 were shot, making for a year-over-year increase of more than 150 percent.
  • In July, 301 were shot, up nearly 160 percent year over year.
  • In August, 310 were shot, up almost 200 percent year over year.
  • In September, so far, 136 were shot, which is up almost 210 percent year over year.
  • Meanwhile, murder is up 60 percent year over year since May.

The city hasn’t seen such levels of violence since the mid-1990s.

The NYPD has blamed the surge in crime on a series of policies that have complicated the department’s work.

Last year’s bail reform banned judges from requiring cash bail for most nonviolent and some lower-level violent crimes, resulting in criminals getting quickly back on the street after arrests.

The city also outlawed officers from pressing their knee against a suspect’s back or chest during an arrest.

Police officers and experts have criticized the law for criminalizing martial arts techniques routinely used by police to safely subdue resisting subjects. They warned it will lead police to use more severe methods, such as tasers, or avoid arrests altogether.

Some NYPD officers told The Epoch Times on the condition of anonymity that officers are hesitant to arrest resisting suspects, unless they pose a present danger to the officers or the public.

Only a small portion of people released due to the reform have been involved in shootings, The New York Post reported. But the officers cited the reform as a demoralizing factor that makes their efforts seem pointless.

Filings for retirement from the NYPD increased over 160 percent between May 25 and Aug. 11, compared to the same period last year.

Mayor Bill de Blasio blamed the violence on the economic impact of lockdowns related to the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus pandemic after initially blaming the slowdown of the court system. The Office of Court Administration rejected the blame, saying many of the court proceedings have continued virtually, the New York Daily News reported.

On Sept. 24, de Blasio promised “a number of very specific plans” will be introduced over the coming weeks to address the violence.

“The solution is to work with communities, and that’s what neighborhood policing is all about,” he said, PIX11 reported.

The following day, Governor Andrew Cuomo called the violence “wholly unacceptable,” calling on the city government to “step up and lead.”

“If none of them want to lead it, I will find someone to lead it,” he said.

View Post

Pro-Biden Republican Has Staffers Lobbying For Chinese Military Proxy

In Standard by National PulseLeave a Comment

This post was originally published on this site

Former Republican Congressman Jim Leach, who endorsed Democratic Presidential candidate Joe Biden, has seen former staffers exit his office to lobby on behalf of Chinese government-linked companies including military proxies.

The “Republican,” who also flip-flopped to support Barack Obama instead of John McCain in the 2008 election, signed a letter declaring himself “concerned about our nation’s security and standing in the world under the leadership of Donald Trump.”

Leach’s letter, which insists President Trump has cozied up to dictators such as Chinese Communist Party leader Xi Jinping and, as a result, “imperiled America’s security,” is hypocritical given that Leach has seen former high-level staffers exit his office to lobby on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party.

Leach joins Never Trump hotbed, Former Republican National Security Officials for Biden.

Michael Borden, who served as a Legislative Assistant to the former Iowa Congressman from 2004 to 2007, leveraged those credentials to join lobbying behemoth and law firm Sidley Austin as a Partner. While at the company, Leach lobbied on behalf of two Chinese Communist Party-linked entities: Alibaba and Hikvision.

Borden’s lobbying contract on behalf of Hikvision began in June of 2018, and has already garnered the firm nearly $3,400,000. Sidley lobbied U.S. Congress, the State Department, the Commerce Department, and the Treasury Department on matters of “prohibitions on certain video surveillance equipment in the National Defense Authorization Act (HR 5515) and other potential legislation.”

Borden’s lobbying registration.

The ban on Hikvision’s usage by federal agencies which was later expanded by the Trump administration that Leach was attempting to reverse, however, came with good reason.

Hikvision is a manufacturer and supplier of video surveillance equipment with deep ties to the Chinese Communist Party given its status as a state-owned company. What’s more, the company identified by the U.S. Department of Defense as a Chinese Communist Party military proxy.

Many fear the data recorded by the company’s surveillance equipment could easily end up in the hands of the Chinese Communist Party.

Despite these fears, Borden had no issue lobbying on behalf of the company in an attempt to reverse the ban and grant the company – and by extension the Chinese Communist Party – a greater ability to spy on the U.S.

The other lucrative contract Borden inked at Sidley Austin was with e-commerce giant Alibaba, beginning in January of 2012 for nearly $300,000.

Borden’s lobbying registration.

In 2015 Forbes reported the “Chinese Government Has A Huge “Stake” In Alibaba” and The New York Times unearthed the company’s “deep political connections of the investment firms, Boyu Capital, Citic Capital Holdings and CDB Capital, the China Development Bank’s private investment arm” in 2014. The Times also noted Alibaba’s “senior executive ranks included sons or grandsons of the most powerful members of the ruling Communist Party.”

Both lobbying registrations are still active.

The Alibaba and Hikvision hires cast former Congressman Leach’s dealings with the Chinese Communist Party while in office in an interesting light: why would the Chinese Communist Party knowingly hire a lobbyist they felt had worked against their interests?

The Leach-endorsed letter, which also proposes President Trump is “dangerously unfit” for a second term and has over 70 signatories, comes from the “Former Republican National Security Officials For Biden,” a project of the “Republicans for the Rule of Law” project.

The group is a hotbed for politicians like Leach – Never Trumpers and establishment-style Republicans – who are keen on selling out America to the Chinese Communist Party in the name of profit.

Just like Hunter Biden.

Time Magazine Partners With ‘National Security Threat’ Huawei To Launch Publication Aimed at Kids

In Standard by National PulseLeave a Comment

Time Magazine has partnered with Huawei – the controversial, Chinese Communist Party-linked telecommunication company labeled a “national security threat” by the Trump administration – to launch a Chinese-language version of its magazine oriented for children.

The partnership led to the creation of a Chinese edition of Time for Kids aimed for use in classrooms across the world.

The digital magazine rollout was “made possible by Huawei and Tan Chong International Limited,” a collaborative effort that Time for Kids editor in chief Andrea Delbanco described herself as being “thrilled” about.

Huawei, however, has extensive links to both the Chinese Communist Party and the People’s Liberation Army, prompting the U.S. State Department to identify it as an “arms of the state – or, more precisely, the Chinese Communist Party.”

Labeled a “national security threat” by the Trump administration and a Chinese military collaborator by the U.S. Department of Defense, Huawei routinely provides the Chinese Communist Party backdoor access to its products, networks and devices.

The U.S. State Department also noted the Chinese Communist Party uses Huawei as an “instrument not only for making money but also for pursuing the Party-State’s agenda and fulfilling its strategic objectives […] deeply enmeshed in Beijing’s system of oppression at home and its increasingly assertive strategic ambitions globally.”

Joy Tan, Senior Vice President of Public Affairs at Huawei Technologies USA, praising the deal “as part of our global inclusion vision that brings digital access to everyone around the world,” is, therefore, cause for concern.

And roughly one month after the establishment, New York-based rag inked a deal with the controversial, the U.S. State Department was imploring the West “to unite against Huawei.”

Time magazine collaborates with a company identified as an existential threat to the West.

The initiative was spurred by COVID-19 and the ensuing shift to online learning, with PR Newswire describing the effort as a “continuation of [Time’s] global initiative to offer digital editions of the school-based publication in multiple languages to support teachers, families and students around the world during this period of school closures due to the coronavirus pandemic.”

In other words, due to a virus caused by the Chinese Communist Party, one of its subsidiaries inked a lucrative contract that allowed it to infiltrate the pages of a widely-circulated and influential American magazine. And beyond ostensibly allowing Huawei the ability to dictate the content of a magazine shared with countless schools, the partnership also calls into question the Chinese Communist Party’s ability to influence the editorial line of Time.

While Time has no shortage of anti-Trump content, notoriously placing the president on a cover alongside a crying child in an effort to criticize President Trump’s border policy and counting columnists such as Ian Bremmer who have attribute fake quotes to President Trump on social media, the Chinese Communist Party is actively seeking a Biden victory per U.S. Intelligence reports.

The other company listed as a partner in the arrangement, Tan Chong International Limited, is a Hong Kong-listed firm headquartered in Singapore that distributes Subaru and Nissan cars across Asia.

View Post

Biden: A Cheapskate Who Prefers to Tax Others Than Give His Own Money

In Standard by American SpectatorLeave a Comment

This post was originally published on this site

If Joe Biden wins the presidency and Democrats take control of the Senate, taxes will rise. Likely a lot. His official plan envisions a $4 trillion hike over the coming decade. But a big victory would empower the Left, which would demand bigger and broader hikes. After all, there will be lots of benefits to increase, programs to create, and, most important, interest groups to pay off.

The only “cut” likely would be restoring the deduction for state and local levies, a windfall for the wealthy that liberals love. Presumably because it acts as a subsidy for big-spending state and local governments. They can keep raising rates, knowing that the federal deduction will lighten the added tax burden.

Despite the latter, however, Democrats will present any plan in terms of compassion and generosity. Compassion once meant to suffer with, that is, to engage, assist, and uplift the poor, to enter into community with them. Now it means making other people write checks. By this definition some of the most compassionate people — forcing the most people to write the biggest checks — themselves give very little money.

Rather like when the Arkansas Clintons wrote used underwear off their taxes, the Bidens made sure they got the tax benefit from their bountiful $120 given to charity in 1999.

A look by Forbes at the charitable giving of presidential candidates last year found that they were “often lagging average Americans in the same tax brackets.” Of Biden, the journalists found that “Joe Biden and his wife donated just $70,000 to charity in the two decades leading up to 2017, per their tax returns. But when their earnings skyrocketed in 2017, so did their giving. That year they handed more than $1 million, or about 9% of their income,” including $250,000 to two family foundations.

The increase was dramatic — a six-fold jump in the percentage of income contributed. Perhaps the Bidens had a spiritual awakening about their responsibility to America’s less fortunate. Perhaps they suddenly found themselves with more money than they had any idea how to spend. Perhaps the windfall coincided with consideration of a presidential run. Giving pennies on an income of more than $11 million might not look good to voters.

A look at Biden’s record is instructive. Whatever the reason for the 2017 upturn, his recent change of heart does not eliminate the lack of giving when the former vice president earned an income that most Americans would consider more than ample.

His tax returns from 1998 to 2018 are available. Americans should compare their situations to his. For instance, every one of those 21 years he earned far more than I did. Yet only in his three peak years, 2013, 2017, and 2018, did he give more than I did — on a substantially lower income. That is not to laud my own giving; others with more meager means do much more than I do. But Biden’s levels are frankly embarrassing: two years under 0.1 percent, nine years between 0.1 and 1 percent, seven years between 1 and 2 percent, and only one year near the Biblical tithe.

His tax returns reveal the following (figures are for total income; gifts to charity; charitable percentage of total income):

2018: $4,580,437; $300,796; 6.6%
2017: $11,037,751; $1,010,762; 9.2%
2016: $396,552; $5,889; 1.5%
2015: $392,279; $6,920; 1.8%
2014: $388,844; $7,380; 1.9%
2013: $408,733; $20,523; 5.0%
2012: $385,072; $7,190; 1.9%
2011: $379,035; $5,540; 1.5%
2010: $379,178; $5,350; 1.4%
2009: $333,182; $4,820; 1.4%
2008: $269,256; $1,885; .7%
2007: $319,853; $995; .3%
2006: $248,459; $380; .2%
2005: $321,379; $380; .1%
2004: $234,271; $380; .2%
2003: $231,375; $260; .1%
2002: $227,811; $260; .1%
2001: $220,712; $360; .2%
2000: $219,953; $360; .2%
1999: $210,797; $120; .06%
1998: $215,432: $195; .09%

Of course, someone could be a competent, effective president even if he or she gives little to charity. Similar analyses of past presidents and presidential candidates reveal only occasional examples of notable generosity. Giving tends to be rather low and often to politically correct causes.

Yet those who most loudly demand that government act to care for the poor should demonstrate the sincerity of their convictions by giving generously with their own money before seeking to conscript the earnings of others. It always is easier to give away other people’s money than one’s own. It certainly is no act of generosity, especially given the political reward expected.

That would seem to be especially important for Joe Biden since his four decades in politics have been unremarkable, with little evidence of strong commitment to principle. This campaign, his main appeal to Democrats was the perception that he was moderate enough to win. The widespread suspicion was that he would do anything necessary to get elected. A demonstrated personal commitment to helping those in need would provide some character evidence for his campaign based on restoring decency and goodness to the U.S. government. A personal commitment also would give credibility to Biden’s advocacy on behalf of substantial increases in social spending.

As it is, tax returns for nearly half of his life in public — 21 of 47 years — suggests a very different Joe Biden. At the very least, he saw no personal responsibility to help meet serious social needs, something traditionally considered important for any believing Catholic. Rather like when the Arkansas Clintons wrote used underwear off their taxes, the Bidens made sure they got the tax benefit from their bountiful $120 given to charity in 1999.

Twice when his giving surged (relatively, anyway), in 2009 and 2017, politics plausibly was a if not the cause. Anomalous was 2013, though 2017 also involved a major increase in income. The test will be what happens if he is elected: does he continue to contribute at his new levels, or will he drop back to the pitiful average evident throughout most of his career?

Whenever Joe Biden speaks of compassion during the coming weeks, it is worth remembering how his willingness to make meaningful contributions of his own money to those most in need is newly arrived. For much of his career he treated the poor as someone else’s problem. That does not bode well for the policies he is likely to pursue if elected president.

Doug Bandow is a Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute. A former Special Assistant to President Ronald Reagan, he is author of The Politics of Envy: Statism as Theology and Beyond Good Intentions: A Biblical View of Politics.

The post Biden: A Cheapskate Who Prefers to Tax Others Than Give His Own Money appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

View Post

Satan’s Followers: Black Lives Matter Protesters March in Charlotte Chanting “F**k Your Jesus” (VIDEO)

In Standard by Gateway PunditLeave a Comment

This post was originally published on this site

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/blm-curse-god.jpg

 

Satan’s followers.
Black Lives Matter marched in Charlotte last week chanting, “F**k your Jesus!”

These are the same leftists destroying cities and terrorizing communities.

This protest was a week ago but was ignored by the liberal media.

TRENDING: PURE EVIL: Bystanders Laugh, Mock Deputies including 31-Year-Old Mother After They Are Ambushed, Shot in the Head — NO ONE Runs to Help Them

The satanic mob later attacked street preacher Sam Bethea.

 

View Post

Unhinged NPR Hack Reporter Josie Huang Flattened to Pavement, Cuffed and Arrested After She Rushed Police Outside Hospital Blocked By BLM Mob

In Standard by Gateway PunditLeave a Comment

This post was originally published on this site

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/josie-huang.jpg

The American public is paying this unhinged woman’s salary.NPR’s Josie Huang flattened on pavement and arrested outside of St. Francis hospital in Los Angeles on Saturday night.

On Saturday night two Sheriff’s deputies including a 31-year-old mother of a six-year-old were ambushed and shot in their car in Los Angeles.
Video shows a very short man or child stalking the sitting car and then shooting the two deputies several times in the head.

When the deputies were brought to St. Francis Hospital in Los Angeles by ambulance Black Lives Matter activistsswarmed the hospital and blocked the entry and screamed, “We hope the bitch dies!”

Local ABC News then captured police arresting a NPR reporter Josie Huang who was laying on the ground.

TRENDING: PURE EVIL: Bystanders Laugh, Mock Deputies including 31-Year-Old Mother After They Are Ambushed, Shot in the Head — NO ONE Runs to Help Them

Bill McCarren, the National Press Club Executive Director, then lashed out at LAPD after NPR reporter Josie Huang was cuffed and arrested.

The LA County Sheriffs explained the arrest of the NPR reporter– She’s NOT the victim!

According to police Josie Huang “ran towards the deputies and ignored repeated commands to stand back.”
How outrageous!
She was hanging with BLM outside the hospital and then stormed the police!

View Post

Chinese Communist Party Floats ‘Defund The U.S. Military’ Campaign For U.S. Left to Adopt

In Standard by National PulseLeave a Comment

This post was originally published on this site

Chinese state-run media argues it is “necessary” for the U.S. to “defund” its military due to its contributions to global pollution.

The commentary, appearing in Chinese Communist Party-run media outlet China Global Television Network (CGTN), appropriated the American left’s “defund the police” slogan to apply to the military.

The op-ed – “Defunding the Military is a Necessary Step for U.S.’ Climate Reckoning” – justifies the claim by insisting America’s military is “one of the largest polluters on the planet.”

In reality, China overwhelmingly dominates the world in its pollution of air and water.

CGTN, therefore, demands that defunding both the military and police are “in order” in the 800-word piece:

“Defund the police” has become a popular slogan, but “defund the military” is also in order when confronted with the dual reality of the country’s complete lack of a serious climate program and fanatic military spending.”

The outlet, a mouthpiece for the Chinese Communist Party, continues, describing the “positive change” that would result from the U.S. government repurposing “a fraction of this money”:

“Serious and long-lasting positive changes could be brought about if even a fraction of this money was set aside to help develop the country’s productive forces away from fossil fuels.”

The absurd call comes as tensions continue to rise between the U.S. and the Chinese Communist Party in light of the latter spawning and spreading a pandemic and perpetrating decades of economic and information warfare.
View Post

BLM Founder Fawns Over Linda Sarsour, Calls Her ‘Excellent… Badass… Friend.’

In Standard by National PulseLeave a Comment

This post was originally published on this site

Black Lives Matter founder Alicia Garza has repeatedly praised far-left activist Linda Sarsour, calling her a “badass,” “excellent,” and “resilient,” while helping Sarsour promote a new book.

Garza’s remarks came during an April 22nd virtual interview hosted by the Commonwealth Club of California.

The hour-long exchange between Garza and Sarsour served to promote Sarsour’s new book, We Are Not Here to Be Bystanders: A Memoir of Love and Resistance.

Throughout the event, Garza repeatedly fawned over the controversial activist, known for leading the 2017 Women’s March, being openly hostile to Jews, and affiliating with virulent anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan. Even the CEO of the far-left Anti-Defamation League has accused her of “fomenting” anti-Semitism.

Despite this, Garza fawned over Sarsour, who she labeled her “badass friend”:

“Let me just start off with a basic question I like to ask all of my badass friends. Were you just born excellent or what happened?”

[embedded content]

Garza lauded Sarsour again, asking how she went from “dope homegirl” to leading “incredible movements”:

“How did you go from dope homegirl to leading all these incredible movements that have literally changed the landscape of this country?”

“I am so so excited to be in conversation today with my sister Linda Sarsour,” she continued, unable to contain her excitement over the prospect of interviewing Sarsour.

Garza also inquired about “the resilience [Sarsour’s] been able to generate that makes [her] a badass leader,” signaling admiration for her “unabashedness”:

“How did you find the power inside of yourself and in your community to be resilient and even more unabashed in the face of those really really terrible attacks?”

“You are literally unstoppable. Look at you, building like the largest civic engagement organization in the country, mobilizing, activating, and engaging Muslim communities in democracy. You’re also, you know, out here just like making things happen,” she opined.

While Sarsour’s past comments provide no shortage of controversy, even leading Democratic Presidential candidate Joe Biden to rebuke her appearance at the Democratic National Convention, her remarks during the interview were equally striking.

Declaring “I’m radical, and I’m proud of it,” Sarsour insisted “you’re never too young to be radicalized” before telling viewers she was writing a version of her book oriented for a younger audience of “fourth, fiffth grade through maybe seventh grade” along with a picture book.

Sarsour also insisted that she is so deeply committed to her activism she is “not afraid to die”:

One of the things that has kept me going and it’s something that I tell people and that scares people when I say this because they want to know how did I get here. I’m actually not afraid to die. I really am not and because of that I continue to go back out, back out, back out, and continue to do the work. And if a consequence means I’m going to lose my life for it, I have come to terms with that.

When Garza asked Sarsour to surmise a “60-second idea to change the world,” Sarsour responded that she’d make “every mayor, every governor, and the White House black women.”

As Black Lives Matter continues to attract attention in light of its role in riots plaguing the U.S., unearthed links continue to reveal the group’s affiliation with Marxist and anti-Semitic elements on the left.